Agronomic Performance of Newly Developed Elite Cowpea Mutant Lines in Eswatini
Kwazi A. K. Mkhonta,
Hussein Shimelis,
Seltene Abady () and
Asande Ngidi
Additional contact information
Kwazi A. K. Mkhonta: African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
Hussein Shimelis: African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
Seltene Abady: African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
Asande Ngidi: African Centre for Crop Improvement (ACCI), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences (SAEES), College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science (CAES), University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
Agriculture, 2025, vol. 15, issue 15, 1-18
Abstract:
Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp) is a vital food security crop in sub-Saharan Africa, including Eswatini. The productivity of the crop is low (<600 kg/ha) in the country due to a lack of improved, locally adapted, and farmer-preferred varieties with biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. The objective of the study was to assess the agronomic performance of newly developed elite cowpea mutants to select best-yielding and adapted pure lines for production and genetic improvement in Eswatini. A total of 30 cowpea genotypes, including 24 newly developed advanced mutant lines, their 3 founder parents and 3 local checks, were profiled for major agronomic traits in two selected sites (Lowveld Experiment and Malkerns Research Stations) using a 6 × 5 alpha lattice design with three replications. A combined analysis of variance revealed that the genotype x location interaction effects were significant ( p < 0.05) for germination percentage (DG %), days to flowering (DTF), days to maturity (DMT), number of pods per plant (NPP), pod length (PDL), number of seeds per pod (NSP), hundred seed weight (HSW), and grain yield (GYD). Elite mutant genotypes, including NKL9P7, BRR4P11, SHR9P5, and NKL9P7-2 exhibited higher grain yields at 3158.8 kg/ha, 2651.6 kg/ha, 2627.5 kg/ha, and 2255.8 kg/ha in that order. The highest-yielding mutant, NKL9P7, produced 70%, 61%, and 54% more grain yield than the check varieties Mtilane, Black Eye, and Accession 792, respectively. Furthermore, the selected genotypes displayed promising yield components such as better PDL (varying from 13.1 to 26.3 cm), NPP (15.9 to 26.8), and NSP (9.8 to 16.2). Grain yield had significant positive correlations ( p < 0.05) with DG %, NSP, and NPP. The principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that 81.5% of the total genotypic variation was attributable to the assessed quantitative traits. Principal component (PC) 1 accounted for 48.6%, while PC 2 and PC 3 contributed 18.9% and 14% of the overall variation, respectively. Key traits correlated with PC1 were NPP with a loading score of 0.91, NSP (0.83), PDL (0.73), GYD (0.68), HSW (0.58), DMT (−0.60), and DTF (−0.43) in a desirable direction. In conclusion, genotypes NKL9P7, BRR4P11, SHR9P5, NKL9P7-2, Bira, SHR3P4, and SHR2P7 were identified as complementary parents with relatively best yields and local adaptation, making them ideal selections for direct production or breeding. The following traits, NPP, NSP, PDL, GYD, and HSW, offered unique opportunities for genotype selection in the cowpea breeding program in Eswatini.
Keywords: cowpea; Eswatini; genetic diversity; mutant varieties; phenotypic traits; yield components (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/15/1631/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/15/1631/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1631-:d:1711231
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().