EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multi Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (Multi-SPEI-ETo): Evaluation of 40 Empirical Methods and Their Influence in SPEI

Tariacuri Marquez-Alvarez, Joel Hernandez Bedolla (), Jesus Pardo-Loaiza, Benjamín Lara-Ledesma and Constantino Domínguez-Sánchez ()
Additional contact information
Tariacuri Marquez-Alvarez: Faculty of Civil Engineering, Michoacan University of Saint Nicolas of Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Mexico
Joel Hernandez Bedolla: Faculty of Civil Engineering, Michoacan University of Saint Nicolas of Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Mexico
Jesus Pardo-Loaiza: Faculty of Civil Engineering, Michoacan University of Saint Nicolas of Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Mexico
Benjamín Lara-Ledesma: Faculty of Civil Engineering, Michoacan University of Saint Nicolas of Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Mexico
Constantino Domínguez-Sánchez: Faculty of Civil Engineering, Michoacan University of Saint Nicolas of Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Mexico

Agriculture, 2025, vol. 15, issue 7, 1-29

Abstract: Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) refers to the combined processes of evaporation and transpiration, which are relevant for hydrology, climate change research, and irrigation system design. The ETo is considered for different climatological studies, agriculture-focused studies, drought indices and climate change as well. From the ETo, water needs can be obtained, and along with precipitation, it is important to determine water availability and drought indices like the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). Currently, there are different methods to estimate the ETo based on various climatic variables, which have been proposed for different climates and applied in different regions worldwide. The method standardized by most studies for determining the ETo is the “modified Penman–Monteith” method by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). This method is versatile as it considers different climatic conditions and global latitudes. Due to limited climate data in developing countries like Mexico, alternative methods are used. The present study analyzed 40 comparative methods for determining ETo and their influence on SPEI. The best methods for the study area were chosen, including Hansen, Hargreaves and Samani, and Trajkovic, as they are the best based on the available information in Mexico. Additionally, each equation was adjusted to reduce errors and achieve closer approximations to actual ETo values to obtain the most accurate values possible. The influence on SPEI calculation indicates overestimations in temperature-based methods and underestimations in radiation and mass-transfer-based methods. The SPEI calculation showed fewer errors when using the modified HANSEN equations. In the absence of information, Allen’s temperature-based method is recommended.

Keywords: evapotranspiration; Penman–Monteith; SPEI; agriculture; Multi-SPEI-ETo; climate risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/703/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/703/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:703-:d:1621019

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-05
Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:703-:d:1621019