Living Mulch Performance in a Tropical Cotton System and Impact on Yield and Weed Control

Vinay Bhaskar, Robin R. Bellinder, Antonio DiTommaso and Michael F. Walter
Additional contact information
Vinay Bhaskar: Horticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, 236 Tower Rd., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Robin R. Bellinder: Horticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, 236 Tower Rd., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Antonio DiTommaso: Soil and Crop Sciences Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, 306 Tower Rd., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Michael F. Walter: Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University,111 Wing Dr., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Agriculture, 2018, vol. 8, issue 2, 1-17

Abstract: Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a major crop in the Vidarbha region of central India. The vertisol soils on which much of the cotton is grown have been severely degraded by the tropical climate, excessive tillage and depletion of organic matter. Living mulches have the ability to mitigate these problems but they can cause crop losses through direct competition with the cotton crop and unreliable weed control. Field experiments were conducted in 2012 and 2013 at four locations in Vidarbha to study the potential for growing living mulches in mono-cropped cotton. Living mulch species evaluated included gliricidia [ Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp.], sesbania [ Sesbania sesban (L.) Merr.], sorghum sudan grass [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench × Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. Drummondii (Nees ex Steud.) de Wet & Harlan] and sunnhemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.). Living mulch height was controlled through mowing and herbicides were not used. Living mulches generated 1 to 13 tons ha −1 of dry matter across sites and years. Weed cover was negatively correlated with both living mulch biomass and cover. Where living mulches were vigorous and established quickly, weed cover was as low as 7%, without the use of herbicides, or inter-row tillage. In a dry year, living mulch growth had a negative impact on cotton yield; however, in a year when soil moisture was not limiting, there was a positive relationship between cotton yield and living mulch biomass. Use of living mulches in cotton production in the Vidarbha region of India is feasible and can lead to both effective weed suppression and acceptable cotton yields.

Keywords: cotton; cover crops; semi-arid cropping systems; gliricidia; India; living mulches; tropical intercropping systems; sesbania; sunnhemp; sustainable agriculture; Vidarbha; weed management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/2/19/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/2/19/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:19-:d:129579

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().