Animal Welfare Payments and Veterinary and Insemination Costs for Dairy Cows

Basil Odermatt, Nina Keil and Markus Lips
Additional contact information
Basil Odermatt: Agroscope, Research Division Competitiveness and System Evaluation, Tänikon 1, CH-8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland
Nina Keil: Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Center for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Agroscope Tänikon 1, CH-8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland
Markus Lips: Agroscope, Research Division Competitiveness and System Evaluation, Tänikon 1, CH-8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland

Agriculture, 2018, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: To promote the provision of animal-friendly housing and management exceeding the minimal legal standards, the Swiss government offers direct payments through two programs for several farm animal species. In dairy cows the BTS program pays for group housing systems with a comfortable lying area separated from the feeding area. The other program, the RAUS, requires that cows receive regular exercise in an outdoor run in the winter and a pasture during summer. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between the two Swiss direct payment programs and the veterinary and insemination costs for dairy cows. We used a large sample of more than 21,000 dairy farm observations from 2004 to 2014 obtained from the Swiss Farm Accountancy Data Network. A propensity score weighting was combined with a linear regression model to estimate the doubly robust treatment effects of the BTS and/or RAUS programs on dairying and breeding. Compared to the control group, that is, farms participating in neither program, farms in the RAUS tended to reduce their veterinary costs by 2% (CHF 4.71). Participation in both the BTS and RAUS programs resulted in a 10% cost reduction (CHF 19.32). An analysis of the effects of participation in both programs, with farms participating in only the RAUS as the control group, indicated a cost reduction of 7% for the farms participating in both programs (CHF 13.54). In contrast, participation in the RAUS only or in the RAUS and the BTS did not have a significant effect on insemination costs. The results thus indicate that the implementation of higher welfare standards can have a positive effect on the economic situation of a farm.

Keywords: animal welfare; direct payment; veterinary costs; insemination costs; FADN; Switzerland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/1/3/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/1/3/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:3-:d:192368

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().