The Effect of Herbage Conservation Method on Protein Value and Nitrogen Utilization in Dairy Cows
Christian Böttger,
Paolo Silacci,
Frigga Dohme-Meier,
Karl-Heinz Südekum and
Ueli Wyss
Additional contact information
Christian Böttger: Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Paolo Silacci: Agroscope, Animal Biology Research Group, Tioleyre 4, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
Frigga Dohme-Meier: Agroscope, Ruminant Research Unit, Tioleyre 4, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
Karl-Heinz Südekum: Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Ueli Wyss: Agroscope, Ruminant Research Unit, Tioleyre 4, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
Agriculture, 2019, vol. 9, issue 6, 1-19
Abstract:
Ruminant production systems frequently rely on grassland utilization and conservation of herbage as hay or silage. Conservation affects the crude protein (CP) composition and protein value, which is particularly recognized during ensiling. The aim of the current study was to describe the effect of the conservation method on forage protein value and N utilization in dairy cows. Herbage from the same sward was cut and conserved as silage (SI), barn-dried hay (BH), or field-dried hay (FH). Laboratory evaluation indicated differences in CP fractions and ruminal degradability of CP. Conserved forages were fed to six lactating Holstein cows in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design, and N balance was assessed. Partitioning of N into milk, feces, and urine was affected only moderately. Lower concentrations of serum, milk, and also urinary urea indicated lower N turnover for FH compared to SI and BH, likely due to lower N intake for FH. However, the use efficiency of feed N for milk N did not differ between the types of forage. Further, high CP concentrations and the unbalanced concentrations of CP and energy in the forages led to excess excretion of N in all treatments and presumably superimposed effects of the conservation method on N utilization.
Keywords: digestibility; energy balance; forage; hay; nitrogen balance; silage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/6/118/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/6/118/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:6:p:118-:d:237913
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().