Workloads of Emergency Call Types in Active-Duty Firefighters

Rudi A. Marciniak (), David J. Cornell, Barbara B. Meyer, Razia Azen, Michael D. Laiosa and Kyle T. Ebersole
Additional contact information
Rudi A. Marciniak: School of Kinesiology, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
David J. Cornell: Department of Physical Therapy & Kinesiology, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
Barbara B. Meyer: School of Rehabilitation Sciences & Technology, College of Health Professions & Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
Razia Azen: School of Education, College of Community Engagement & Professions, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53203, USA
Michael D. Laiosa: Joseph J. Zilber College of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53205, USA
Kyle T. Ebersole: School of Rehabilitation Sciences & Technology, College of Health Professions & Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA

Merits, 2024, vol. 4, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Firefighting is an occupation with high injury risks, particularly when conducting fireground operations. The fire service generally quantifies the job demands of firefighting through tracking emergency call volume across 24 h shifts; however, volume alone does not account for the specific work completed in response to different call types. Utilization of external (i.e., objective work) and internal (i.e., intrinsic responses to work) training load measures have the potential to quantify the multifaceted workload demands of responses to medical and fire emergencies and inform injury prevention strategies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to utilize training load measures to quantify the workloads across emergency call types. For medical emergencies and fire emergencies, the external load and the physiological, perceived, and cumulative internal loads were quantified. The results indicate that the magnitude of objective work required for fire emergency responses that include fire suppression and/or auto-extrication is approximately three times greater than that of medical and other fire emergency (i.e., no suppression or extrication) responses. Further, in response to the objective work for fire suppression and/or auto-extrication calls, the intrinsic workloads are six times more physiologically and perceptually demanding than—as well as double, cumulatively—those of medical and other fire emergency responses.

Keywords: job demands; load; emergency response; occupational worker; tactical athlete (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J L M (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/4/1/1/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/4/1/1/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:1-18:d:1329177

Access Statistics for this article

Merits is currently edited by Ms. Aria Hou

More articles in Merits from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().