EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Workplace Leadership Development Practices: An Environmental Scan

Roslyn Cameron (), Christine Edwards and Gregory Harper
Additional contact information
Roslyn Cameron: Centre for Organisational Change & Agility (COCA), Torrens University Australia, Wakefield Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Christine Edwards: Centre for Organisational Change & Agility (COCA), Torrens University Australia, Wakefield Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Gregory Harper: Business & Hospitality, Torrens University Australia, Brisbane Campus, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia

Merits, 2024, vol. 4, issue 1, 1-16

Abstract: Effective workplace leadership development programs are considered critical to organizational adaptive capacity and sustainability. The purpose of this exploratory study is to conduct an environmental scan of contemporary practices and approaches to leadership and management development programs in Australian workplaces. An online survey was distributed to a sample of Australian human resource professionals given the field’s strong practitioner orientation. The survey sample includes members of the Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI), the professional body for human resource professionals and practitioners in Australia. The findings indicate a substantial majority of the current practice is not informed by evidence-based theory or practice. The most commonly used model is 70:20:10, which lacks a coherent evidence base and has been widely criticized for that reason. The findings point to the frequent application of bespoke leadership frameworks and significant theory–practice gaps. While organizations cite “ensuring delivery of business results”, as the main driver for instigating leadership development programs, with support from top management being crucial to the effectiveness and success of leadership development programs/interventions, evaluation and measurement of impact and return on investment remains problematic. Based on these insights, we present a future research agenda for monitoring and evaluating leadership development programs that will build a stronger theoretical foundation to inform evidence-based practice.

Keywords: leadership development; ROI; work-based learning; 70:20:10; coaching; mentoring (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J L M (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/4/1/3/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8104/4/1/3/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:3-50:d:1334555

Access Statistics for this article

Merits is currently edited by Ms. Aria Hou

More articles in Merits from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jmerit:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:3-50:d:1334555