Shades of Green: Modelling Differences in Thought and Action among Electric Utility Regime Actors in the Energy System Transition

Bonnie Wylie Pratt (), Jon D. Erickson, Jane Kolodinsky, Erik Monsen and William J. Wales
Additional contact information
Bonnie Wylie Pratt: Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Jon D. Erickson: Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Erik Monsen: Grossman School of Business, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
William J. Wales: Department of Management, School of Business, University of Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 12222, USA

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 20, 1-17

Abstract: There is wide variability in how organizations approach sustainability and the energy system transition toward using more renewables. In the electric power industry, while some distribution utilities have leaned into the transition, others have taken a more conservative approach. Grounded in an institutional resource-based perspective, this multi-level study examines key intra-firm, firm, and individual leadership factors that impact an organization’s commitment to renewables. Sustainability orientation in the power industry is assessed as the percent of renewable energy in a utility’s fuel mix compared with their expressed commitment to renewables and energy efficiency within planning documents. Through computer-aided text analysis, characteristics of 170 electric utilities in the United States were analyzed to predict sustainability orientation. Results indicate that rurality, deregulation, and the entrepreneurial orientation of a utility, as expressed within their Integrated Resource Plans, explain a significant amount of variability in the sustainability orientation of electric utilities.

Keywords: energy system transition; entrepreneurial orientation; renewable energy; sustainability orientation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13287/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13287/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13287-:d:943650

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().