Endogenous Growth: Valuable Advance, Substantive Misnomer

William Baumol

History of Political Economy, 2009, vol. 41, issue 5, 304-314

Abstract: Endogenous growth theory has made many valuable contributions, perhaps most notably in providing the tools that permit more effective empirical investigation of the growth process. Its one shortcoming, which is stressed here, is its inability to live up to its name, for where it has failed is in describing the wheels, the balance springs, and the interactions of the various other critical components of the mechanism that drives the growth process. This is no criticism because that is not the legitimate task of macroeconomics, one of whose prime virtues lies in judicious suppression of such complicating details in order to permit a better grasp of the overall workings of the economic machine. Such details are the task of the microeconomist, whose work must supplement the macro insights so that, together, we will obtain a fuller understanding of the growth process and how it may be improved.

Keywords: endogenous; growth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/41/Suppl_1/304.full.pdf+html link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:41:y:2009:i:5:p:304-314

Access Statistics for this article

History of Political Economy is currently edited by Kevin D. Hoover

More articles in History of Political Economy from Duke University Press Duke University Press 905 W. Main Street, Suite 18B Durham, NC 27701.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster ().