Are There Important Differences between Classical and Twenty-First-Century Monetary Theories? Did the Keynesian and Monetarist Revolutions Matter?

John H. Wood

History of Political Economy, 2014, vol. 46, issue 1, 117-148

Abstract: It is not generally realized how little changed monetary theory and the theory and practice of monetary policy are from the time before Keynes’s General Theory. Explanations of business fluctuations by Keynes’s predecessors closely resemble the current literature, notwithstanding significant changes in the economic structure and several vaunted revolutions in theory in the meantime. Monetary policy is similarly unchanged from its dominant focus on financial stability and its atheoretic responses to shocks. The ambitious attempts of Keynes and the monetarists to account for money and uncertainty have been rejected by the mainstream of their fellow economists.

Keywords: monetary theory; John Maynard Keynes; Milton Friedman; monetary policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/46/1/117.full.pdf+html link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:46:y:2014:i:1:p:117-148

Access Statistics for this article

History of Political Economy is currently edited by Kevin D. Hoover

More articles in History of Political Economy from Duke University Press Duke University Press 905 W. Main Street, Suite 18B Durham, NC 27701.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster ().