EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Natural Theology, Theodicy, and Political Economy in Nineteenth-Century Britain: William Whewell’s Struggle

Paul Oslington

History of Political Economy, 2017, vol. 49, issue 4, 575-606

Abstract: William Whewell (1794–1866) exerted a huge influence over nineteenth-century British intellectual life. This paper places Whewell’s writings on political economy within this context, emphasizing the theological basis of his interest in the subject, and his struggle with the problem of theodicy which shaped his later view of political economy. Particular attention is paid to his earliest writing on the subject, an unpublished 1827 sermon in which he attacked the deductive and atheist political economy of Ricardo, and to a lesser extent Malthus’s principle of population. Whewell’s failure to develop a satisfactory economic theodicy (following similar lack of success by Malthus, Sumner, Whately, and Chalmers) contributed to the collapse of the British tradition of scientific natural theology and the subsequent separation of theology from political economy in the middle decades of the nineteenth century.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi-org.proxy.lib.duke.edu/10.1215/00182702-4296317 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:49:y:2017:i:4:p:575-606

Access Statistics for this article

History of Political Economy is currently edited by Kevin D. Hoover

More articles in History of Political Economy from Duke University Press Duke University Press 905 W. Main Street, Suite 18B Durham, NC 27701.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:49:y:2017:i:4:p:575-606