Reacting to the Lucas Critique: The Keynesians' Replies

Aurélien Goutsmedt, Erich Pinzon-Fuchs, Matthieu Renault and Francesco Sergi

History of Political Economy, 2019, vol. 51, issue 3, 535-556

Abstract: In 1976, Robert Lucas explicitly criticized Keynesian macroeconometric models for their inability to correctly predict the effects of alternative economic policies. Today, most contemporary macroeconomists and some historians of economics consider that Lucas’s critique led forcefully to an immediate disqualification of the Keynesian macroeconometric approach. This narrative is based on the interpretation of the Lucas critique as a fundamental principle for economic reasoning that was (and still is) logically unquestionable. We consider that this narrative is problematic both in terms of historiography and the effects that it can have in the field as a way of assigning importance and credit to particular macroeconomists. Indeed, the point of view of the Keynesian economists is missing despite the fact that they were the target of Lucas’s paper and that throughout the 1970s and 1980s they produced a fierce reaction against it. In this article we analyze the reactions by a broad set of authors (which we label "Keynesians") that disputed the relevance of the critique. In spite of their diversity in methodological, theoretical, and policy issues, these reactions were characterized by their common questioning of the empirical and practical relevance of the Lucas critique.

Keywords: history of macroeconomics; Lucas critique; Keynesian macroeconometrics; stagflation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7551912 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Reacting to the Lucas Critique: The Keynesians' Replies (2019)
Working Paper: Reacting to the Lucas Critique: The Keynesians' Replies (2019)
Working Paper: Reacting to the Lucas Critique: The Keynesians' Replies (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hop:hopeec:v:51:y:2019:i:3:p:535-556

Access Statistics for this article

History of Political Economy is currently edited by Kevin D. Hoover

More articles in History of Political Economy from Duke University Press Duke University Press 905 W. Main Street, Suite 18B Durham, NC 27701.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Center for the History of Political Economy Webmaster ().