Small differences matter: How regional distinctions in educational and labour market policy account for heterogeneity in NEET rates

Johann Bacher, Christina Koblbauer, Heinz Leitgöb and Dennis Tamesberger
Additional contact information
Johann Bacher: Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Christina Koblbauer: Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Heinz Leitgöb: Catholic University, Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Dennis Tamesberger: Department for Economic, Welfare and Social Policy, Chamber of Labour, Linz, Austria

Journal for Labour Market Research, 2017, vol. 51, issue 1, Article 4

Abstract: "Labour market and education policy makers and researchers are increasingly focusing on the NEET indicator as a supplement to the youth unemployment rate. Analyses of factors influencing NEET have concentrated primarily on individual characteristics such as gender and migration background on one hand, and on macro-level factors of nations such as economic growth and minimum wage regulations on the other. However, nations are not homogenous, especially when a country is divided into several federal states, as is the case with Austria. This article aims to analyse regional differences within Austria. In order to explain the differences, we define a multilevel model that contains four contextual factors: the importance of upper secondary education; the importance of dual education; vacant jobs; and expenditures for active labour market policy. Because the institutional level addresses different age groups, the analysis was split into two age groups: 15 - 19 and 20 - 24 years. The results have shown that, besides the social structure of the population, contextual factors like the upper secondary education, the dual education, vacant jobs, and expenditures for active labour market policy are also relevant for explaining regional differences in the NEET rates. But one main insight was that the impact of the contextual factors varies between different social groups." (Author's abstract, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))

Keywords: Österreich; Ausbildungsquote; Auswirkungen; betriebliche Berufsausbildung; Bildungspolitik; Bundesländer; Föderalismus; institutionelle Faktoren; Jugendliche; junge Erwachsene; offene Stellen; ökonomische Faktoren; Quote; regionale Disparität; regionale Faktoren; regionaler Vergleich; NEET; Sekundarstufe II; Arbeitsmarktindikatoren; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; 2006-2012 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-017-0232-6

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabjlr:v:51:p:art.04

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/economics/journal/12651

DOI: 10.1186/s12651-017-0232-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal for Labour Market Research is currently edited by Joachim Möller et al.

More articles in Journal for Labour Market Research from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek ().