Investigating the four-level inquiry continuum on college students' higher order thinking and peer interaction tendencies

Kaili Lu, Harrison Yang and Hui Xue

International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 2021, vol. 30, issue 3, 358-367

Abstract: Research positively associates inquiry-based learning (IBL) activities to the benefits of students' higher order thinking, collaboration, and communication skill. However, few studies have examined the impact of IBL activities on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) and peer interaction at all levels of inquiry. This study examined 58 college students' perceptions of their HOTS and peer interaction tendencies from the perspective of a four-level inquiry continuum process. Overall, the study found that as IBL activities moved from the first level of inquiry (confirmation inquiry) to the fourth level of inquiry (open inquiry), students' HOTS and peer interaction tendencies strengthened. Further analysis showed that students' HOTS and peer interaction tendencies changed significantly at different levels of IBL activities. Highly student-centred IBL activities were significantly more effective than highly teacher-directed activities. In addition, there was a strong correlation between students' HOTS and peer interaction tendencies in IBL activities. The findings of this study have practical implications for educators, indicating that they should design, develop, and implement IBL activities, considering all four levels of inquiry as a continuum. Educators should also find ways to leverage the relationship between students' higher HOTS and peer interaction.

Keywords: higher order thinking skills; HOTS; peer interaction; inquiry-based learning; IBL; levels of inquiry; confirmed inquiry; structured inquiry; guided inquiry; open inquiry. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118192 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:358-367

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Innovation and Learning from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().