EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The impact of thinking tools on the argumentation skills of pre-service science teachers in flipped learning

Guo Su, Taotao Long, Zhiyan Wang, Qingcui Zeng and Xueping Wang

International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 2022, vol. 31, issue 3, 348-368

Abstract: This research is aimed at exploring the effect of the application of thinking tools on the pre-service science teachers' argumentation skills in flipped learning. A single-group repeated experiment was conducted, involving 34 pre-service science teachers from a large research university in central China. Data about students' argumentation abilities and attitudes towards the thinking tools was collected. The finding was that compared with the use of a diagram-based thinking tool, the pre-service science teachers ranked higher in argumentation skills when using a text-based online collaborative visual thinking tool. Although they agreed that the online collaborative visual diagram-based thinking tool could better reflect their thinking processes, they also tended to use the online text-based visual thinking tool.

Keywords: argumentation; thinking tools; flipped classroom; pre-service science teachers. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=122065 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:348-368

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Innovation and Learning from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:348-368