 Why realism and methodological pluralism matter for robust research and public policy: perspectives from behavioural economicsInternational Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 2020, vol. 11, issue 2, 130-148 Abstract: Conventional economics maintains that a critical test of the veracity of robust economic theory is its capacity to generate plausible economic predictions, irrespective of the realism of the theories' underlying assumptions. This methodological argument even holds for relatively less conventional approaches to economics such as behavioural, heterodox, experimental, and institutional. Following upon research in behavioural economics, I argue that such a methodology can easily result in the illusion of causality, the omission of potentially key variables, and closing the doors to key analytical questions as well as to publication bias. This generate perverse analytical results, with severe consequence for public policy. I argue that methodological pluralism is critical to the construction of robust economic theory, irrespective of ones' political orientation. Examples are drawn from financial markets, labour markets, and macroeconomics to illustrate this pluralistic perspective to economic analyses. Keywords: methodological pluralism; behavioural economics; public policy; assumptions; realism; analytical predictions; publication bias. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:130-148 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.