Marginalism and maths teaching in introductory economics

Martin K. Jones

International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 2020, vol. 11, issue 2, 189-200

Abstract: Marginalist teaching methods should be abandoned in first-year economics courses, and teaching should be opened up to a wider, more pluralist, mode of teaching. This paper focuses on one aspect of marginalist teaching: the 'iterative' argument by which marginal cost is brought into equilibrium with marginal revenue. It is shown that the argument is difficult to understand, is never used beyond first year teaching, lacks empirical content and misleads as to the content of neoclassical economics. This issue extends beyond this example to other marginalist aspects of typical introductory economics courses. The genesis of these teaching methods is a desire by early marginalists to avoid mathematical notation. However, the growth of mathematical courses within modern economics programs makes this unnecessary. The elimination of these methods opens space in the curriculum for other topics.

Keywords: mathematics teaching in economics; marginalism; introductory economics; maths. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=111290 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:189-200

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().