Pedagogical approaches to theories of endogenous versus exogenous money

Stephen Kinsella ()

International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 2010, vol. 1, issue 3, 276-282

Abstract: Pedagogical pluralism is difficult to implement in practice. This paper contrasts two approaches to the modelling of money in macroeconomics: the stock-flow consistent macroeconomic model of Godley and Lavoie and the mainstream neoclassical dynamic general equilibrium model of Barro. Students can contrast and compare approaches effectively when thematic overlaps are significantly large to make comparisons obvious. Only then should a pluralist approach be considered desirable.

Keywords: pedagogical pluralism; pedagogy; stock flow consistent modelling; macroeconomics; dynamic general equilibrium modelling; Godley; Lavoie; Barro; economics education. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=34689 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:276-282

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().