 Two opposing literary critiques of socialism: George Orwell versus Eugen Richter and Henry HazlittInternational Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 2016, vol. 7, issue 2, 116-134 Abstract: Orwell's famous fictions, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four criticised totalitarian forms of socialism from a public choice perspective, assuming that socialism would work as an economic system as long as the proper political institutions were in place to curb the potential for the abuse of power. This is contrasted with two novels by others who took the opposite approach: Richter's Pictures of the Socialistic Future and Hazlitt's Time Will Run Back. These two assumed that the political implementation of socialism would be perfect but that socialism would necessarily turn totalitarian because of the problem of economic calculation. These novels assumed away the public choice problem of institutions and the abuse of power and focused on the political implications of socialism as a purely economic system. Contrasting these two sets of novels shows how the Austrian and public choice schools criticise socialism in two entirely different ways. Keywords: George Orwell; Eugen Richter; Henry Hazlitt; socialism; totalitarianism; democratic socialism; public choice; Austrian school; 1984; Nineteen Eighty-Four; Animal Farm; economic calculation; socialist calculation; knowledge; literary critiques; abuse of power; economic thought. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:116-134 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.