An Argument-Based Approach to Test Fairness: The Case of Multiple-Form Equating in the College English Test

Yan Jin and Eric Wu
Additional contact information
Yan Jin: School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
Eric Wu: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Temple City, CA, USA

International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 2017, vol. 7, issue 3, 58-72

Abstract: This article aims to demonstrate how innovative testing practices can effectively prevent high-tech mass cheating and improve fairness in language assessment. The article first introduces Xi's (2010) view of validity and fairness and her proposal of an argument-based approach to empirically examining test fairness. The article then describes the threat to fair testing posed by high-tech cheating on the College English Test (CET). A study of multiple-form equating was conducted and reported in the article, which was aimed at achieving alternate form reliability when multiple versions and multiple forms were used in the CET. The article then concludes with a discussion on the usefulness of an argument-based approach to empirically examining test fairness.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... 8/IJCALLT.2017070104 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:58-72

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT) is currently edited by Bin Zou

More articles in International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().