Determinants of Experienced Utility: Laws and Implications
Manel Baucells () and
Rakesh K. Sarin ()
Additional contact information
Rakesh K. Sarin: Decisions, Operations and Technology Management Area, UCLA Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
Decision Analysis, 2013, vol. 10, issue 2, 135-151
Satisfaction in experiencing the future depends on decisions made today. We consider six well-known psychological laws governing satisfaction. The laws capture habit formation and satiation. We show it is possible to formalize these laws by means of a utility model and to derive implications from the laws: wanting versus liking, crescendo, recharge periods, variety seeking, and craving. The discussion combines mathematical propositions, experimental findings in psychology, and time-honored wisdom. We discuss how the sixth law---projection bias---may lead to incorrect predictions of experienced utility and suboptimal life-balance choices.
Keywords: experienced utility; time and budget allocation; habit formation; satiation; variety seeking; craving; projection bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:10:y:2013:i:2:p:135-151
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Matthew Walls ().