Scale Dependence and Ranking Intervals in Additive Value Models Under Incomplete Preference Information

Antti Punkka () and Ahti Salo ()
Additional contact information
Antti Punkka: Systems Analysis Laboratory, Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Aalto, Finland
Ahti Salo: Systems Analysis Laboratory, Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University School of Science, 00076 Aalto, Finland

Decision Analysis, 2014, vol. 11, issue 2, 83-104

Abstract: A multiattribute additive value function that has been built from a complete specification of the decision maker's (DM's) preferences gives scale-independent decision recommendations, which do not depend on how the value function is normalized. In this paper, we show that if the preference specification is incomplete, many widely employed decision rules for comparing alternatives give scale-dependent decision recommendations in which the relative ranking of alternatives depends not only on the DM's preferences but also on the normalization of the value function. But because normalization does not involve preference statements, the recommendations should be scale independent so that they do not depend on the chosen normalization. To provide such recommendations, we propose ranking intervals , which show how a given alternative compares with all other alternatives for all value functions that are consistent with the stated preference information. These intervals can be computed from mixed integer linear optimization problems that are constrained by inequalities implied by the DM's preference statements. We illustrate the use of ranking intervals by analyzing university rankings and discuss their uses in project portfolio selection.

Keywords: multiple criteria decision analysis; ranking; incomplete information; sensitivity analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2014.0290 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:83-104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().