Gulf Coast Port Selection Using Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis

Rivelino R. De Icaza (), Gregory S. Parnell () and Edward A. Pohl ()
Additional contact information
Rivelino R. De Icaza: Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Gregory S. Parnell: Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Edward A. Pohl: Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701; Center for Innovation in Healthcare Logistics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

Decision Analysis, 2019, vol. 16, issue 2, 87-104

Abstract: In today’s competitive global markets, ports play a vital role in global supply chain operations. A port selection model was developed to demonstrate the potential to aid shipping line companies with decisions to select the best ports in the U.S. Gulf Coast. Because port selection is complex, is dynamic, and includes multiple objectives, a multiple-objective decision analysis quantified the value of the various ports using industry data and an industry expert’s knowledge. In addition, a corresponding cost model was developed using available cost data for each port. Monte Carlo simulation analyzed the uncertainties in the value and cost models. For the demonstration model scenario assumptions, the results show that the Houston port would be the best alternative for shipping lines in the Gulf Coast. The value model also identified opportunities for improvement for each port compared with the best West Coast port. The demonstration models show that port data exist to support the development of a multiple-objective decision analysis model and a cost model that can provide useful insights to port selection decision makers. Furthermore, these models can be easily tailored to support port selection in other regions by tailoring the objectives and measures to the decision-maker objectives.

Keywords: decision analysis; port selection; multiple-objective decision analysis; supply chain management; Panama Canal expansion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2018.0381 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:87-104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().