A Probability Scoring Rule for Simultaneous Events
Andrew Grant (),
David Johnstone () and
Oh Kang Kwon ()
Additional contact information
Andrew Grant: Discipline of Finance, University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
David Johnstone: Discipline of Finance, University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia; School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia
Oh Kang Kwon: Discipline of Finance, University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
Decision Analysis, 2019, vol. 16, issue 4, 301-313
Abstract:
We develop a scoring rule tailored to a decision maker who makes simultaneous bets on events that occur at times that require bets to be placed together. The rule proposed captures the economic benefit to a well-defined bettor who acts on one set of probabilities p against a baseline or rival set q . To allow for simultaneous bets, we assume a myopic power utility function with a risk aversion parameter tailored to suit the given user or application. Our score function is “proper” in the usual sense of motivating honesty. Apart from a special case of power utility, namely, log utility, the score is not “local,” which we excuse because a local scoring rule cannot capture the economic result that our score reflects. An interesting property of our rule is that the individual scores from individual events are multiplicative, rather than additive. Probability scores are often added to give a measure of aggregate performance over a set of trials. Our rule is unique in that scores must be multiplied to reach a meaningful aggregate.
Keywords: probability forecasting; weighted scoring rule; tailored scoring rule; power utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2019.0393 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:301-313
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Decision Analysis from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().