Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications

Daniel Robey and Marie-Claude Boudreau
Additional contact information
Daniel Robey: Department of Computer Information Systems, College of Business Administration, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-4015
Marie-Claude Boudreau: Department of Computer Information Systems, College of Business Administration, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-4015

Information Systems Research, 1999, vol. 10, issue 2, 167-185

Abstract: Although much contemporary thought considers advanced information technologies as either determinants or enablers of radical organizational change, empirical studies have revealed inconsistent findings to support the deterministic logic implicit in such arguments. This paper reviews the contradictory empirical findings both across studies and within studies, and proposes the use of theories employing a logic of opposition to study the organizational consequences of information technology. In contrast to a logic of determination, a logic of opposition explains organizational change by identifying forces both promoting change and impeding change. Four specific theories are considered: organizational politics, organizational culture, institutional theory, and organizational learning. Each theory is briefly described to illustrate its usefulness to the problem of explaining information technology's role in organizational change. Four methodological implications of using these theories are also discussed: empirical identification of opposing forces, statement of opposing hypotheses, process research, and employing multiple interpretations.

Keywords: Organizational Transformation; Impacts of Technology; Organization Theory; Research Methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.2.167 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:10:y:1999:i:2:p:167-185

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().