A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research

Weiyin Hong (), Frank K. Y. Chan (), James Y. L. Thong (), Lewis C. Chasalow () and Gurpreet Dhillon ()
Additional contact information
Weiyin Hong: Department of ISOM, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong; and Lee Business School, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120
Frank K. Y. Chan: Department of Information Systems, Decision Sciences and Statistics, ESSEC Business School, 95021 Cergy Pontoise Cedex, France
James Y. L. Thong: Department of ISOM, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Lewis C. Chasalow: Lebanon Valley College, Annville, Pennsylvania 17003
Gurpreet Dhillon: School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284

Information Systems Research, 2014, vol. 25, issue 1, 111-136

Abstract: This paper discusses the value of context in theory development in information systems (IS) research. We examine how prior research has incorporated context in theorizing and develop a framework to classify existing approaches to contextualization. In addition, we expound on a decomposition approach to contextualization and put forth a set of guidelines for developing context-specific models. We illustrate the application of the guidelines by constructing and comparing various context-specific variations of the technology acceptance model (TAM)---i.e., the decomposed TAM that incorporates interaction effects between context-specific factors, the extended TAM with context-specific antecedents, and the integrated TAM that incorporates mediated moderation and moderated mediation effects of context-specific factors. We tested the models on 972 individuals in two technology usage contexts: a digital library and an agile Web portal. The results show that the decomposed TAM provides a better understanding of the contexts by revealing the direct and interaction effects of context-specific factors on behavioral intention that are not mediated by the TAM constructs of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. This work contributes to the ongoing discussion about the importance of context in theory development and provides guidance for context-specific theorizing in IS research.

Keywords: theory development; contextualization; context-specific model; general model; technology adoption; technology acceptance model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (42)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0501 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:111-136

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().