Facilitating the Transformational: An Exploration of Control in Cyberinfrastructure Projects and the Discovery of Field Control

Gregory D. Moody (), Laurie J. Kirsch (), Sandra A. Slaughter, Brian Kimball Dunn () and Qin Weng ()
Additional contact information
Gregory D. Moody: Lee Business School, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154
Laurie J. Kirsch: Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Sandra A. Slaughter: Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Brian Kimball Dunn: Price College of Business, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
Qin Weng: Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260

Information Systems Research, 2016, vol. 27, issue 2, 324-346

Abstract: Emerging from rapid advances in digitization and technological capabilities is a new form of information systems development project: cyber projects. Cyber projects are complex, massive, and ambitious, often involving hundreds of academic, government, and industry professionals, requiring years of development, and costing millions of dollars. In our study, we examine how control is exercised in cyber projects. Based on a longitudinal study over eight years, we develop a process theory of the control of cyber projects. Initially we observe that project control is driven by the field, i.e., all of the individual or collective entities that subscribe to the general purpose of the project. This form of control is later replaced by a more bureaucratic form from government-sponsored entities to ensure that traditional project objectives are met. Once construction begins and the field understands the implications and promise of the project, we observe that control is again exerted by the primary project users in the field, complemented by authority-based control exerted by the government-sponsored entisty in the field.

Keywords: control; project management; cyberinfrastructure projects; strategic action fields (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0619 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:324-346

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().