Boundary Organization Practices for Collaboration in Enterprise Integration

Adrian Yeow (), Siew Kien Sia (), Christina Soh () and Cecil Chua ()
Additional contact information
Adrian Yeow: Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494
Siew Kien Sia: Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
Christina Soh: Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
Cecil Chua: University of Auckland Business School, Auckland 1010, New Zealand

Information Systems Research, 2018, vol. 29, issue 1, 149-168

Abstract: Multiparty collaboration is particularly challenging in large-scale enterprise integration (EI) implementations as diverse organizational subunits and external consultants need to work together to enact transformational change. We argue from prior research that a boundary organization—a formal organizational space that enables participants with divergent interests to collaborate—provides a relatively durable structure to manage emergent tensions and conflicts among stakeholders in EI projects. To better understand how a boundary organization enables ongoing, dynamic, multiparty collaboration, we introduce the concept of boundary organization practices to describe practices enacted as part of the boundary organization to define the working rules and arrangements for diverse stakeholders to work together. We conducted a longitudinal exploratory case study of a multiyear EI implementation in a large logistics organization. Our analysis of the longitudinal data led us to identify three sets of boundary organization practices (i.e., organizing to negotiate, to contain, and to sustain). These sets of practices emerged to address the divergence that arose in each of the three phases (designing, realizing, and leveraging) of EI implementation. We also find artifacts to be an integral part of the boundary organization practices as they motivated, coordinated, and enabled collaboration among diverse stakeholders.

Keywords: enterprise integration; enterprise system; boundary organization; boundary organization practice; practice perspective; boundary spanning; longitudinal research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/isre.2017.0743 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:149-168

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().