Managing Digital Platforms in User Organizations: The Interactions Between Digital Options and Digital Debt

Knut H. Rolland (), Lars Mathiassen () and Arun Rai ()
Additional contact information
Knut H. Rolland: Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Lars Mathiassen: Center for Process Innovation, Department of Computer Information Systems, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Arun Rai: Center for Process Innovation, Department of Computer Information Systems, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Information Systems Research, 2018, vol. 29, issue 2, 419-443

Abstract: As organizations increasingly use digital platforms to facilitate innovation, researchers are seeking to understand how platforms shape business practices. Although extant literature offers important insights into platform management from a platform-owner perspective, we know little about how organizations manage industry platforms provided by external parties to generate opportunities and overcome challenges in relation to their infrastructure and work processes. As part of larger ecosystems, these digital platforms offer organizations bundles of digital options that they can selectively invest in over time. At the same time, organizations’ previous investments in digital infrastructure and work processes produce a legacy of digital debt that conditions how they manage their digital platforms over time. Against this backdrop, we investigate how digital options and digital debt were implicated in a large Scandinavian media organization’s management of a news production platform over nearly 17 years. Drawing on extant literature and the findings from this case, we theorize the progression of and interactions between digital options and digital debt during an organization’s digital platform management in relation to its infrastructure and work processes. The theory reveals the complex choices that organizations face in such efforts: While they may have to resolve digital debt to make a platform’s digital options actionable, hesitancy to plant digital debt may equally well prevent them from realizing otherwise attractive digital options. Similarly, while identified digital options may offer organizations new opportunities to resolve digital debt, eagerness to realize digital options may just as easily lead to unwise planting of digital debt.

Keywords: digital platforms; digital options; digital debt; digital infrastructure; organizational management of industry platforms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/isre.2018.0788 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:29:y:2018:i:2:p:419-443

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().