Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation

François-Xavier de Vaujany (), Vladislav V. Fomin (), Stefan Haefliger () and Kalle Lyytinen ()
Additional contact information
François-Xavier de Vaujany: DRM, CNRS, [UMR 7088], Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, 75016 Paris, France
Vladislav V. Fomin: Vilnius University Kaunas Faculty, 44280 Kaunas, Lithuania
Stefan Haefliger: Cass Business School, City, University of London, London EC1Y 8TZ, United Kingdom
Kalle Lyytinen: Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Information Systems Research, 2018, vol. 29, issue 3, 755-773

Abstract: As information technology (IT)-based regulation has become critical and pervasive for contemporary organizing, information systems research turns mostly a deaf ear to the topic. Current explanations of IT-based regulation fit into received frameworks such as structuration theory, actor-network theory, or neoinstitutional analyses but fail to recognize the unique capacities IT and related IT-based regulatory practices offer as a powerful regulatory means. Any IT-based regulation system is made up of rules, practices, and IT artifacts and their relationships. We propose this trifecta as a promising lens to study IT-based regulation in that it sensitizes scholars into how IT artifacts mediate rules and constitute regulatory processes embracing rules, capacities of IT endowed by the artifact, and organizational practices. We review the concepts of rules and IT-based regulation and identify two gaps in the current research on organizational regulation: (1) the critical role of sensemaking as part of IT-based regulation, and (2) the challenge of temporally coupling rules and their enactment during IT-based regulation. To address these gaps we introduce the concept of regulatory episode as a unit of analysis for studying IT-based regulation. We also formulate a tentative research agenda for IT-based regulation that focuses on tensions triggered by the three key elements of the IT-based regulatory processes. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0771 .

Keywords: information technology; IT capacities; rule; regulation; practice; mediation; embodiment; meaning; time; phenomenology; actor-network theory; Latour; Merleau-Ponty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/isre.2017.0771 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:29:y:2018:i:3:p:755-773

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().