EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bargaining over Data: When Does Making the Buyer More Informed Help?

Jyotishka Ray (), Syam Menon () and Vijay Mookerjee ()
Additional contact information
Jyotishka Ray: Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, California State University–East Bay, Hayward, California 94542;
Syam Menon: Department of Information Systems, Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083
Vijay Mookerjee: Department of Information Systems, Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083

Information Systems Research, 2020, vol. 31, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: The explosive growth of eBusiness has allowed many companies to accumulate a repertoire of unique data sets that can provide substantial value to other firms. These data sets are a growing source of revenue for their owners—one that can generate millions of dollars each year. Given its proprietary nature, the value of the data to a potential buyer is often uncertain to both parties. Therefore, a mutually acceptable price is usually arrived at through a process of negotiation. A seller can choose to provide a demonstration (demo; presentation) to mitigate this uncertainty and/or reduce bias. We adapt a generalization of Nash bargaining to identify when such demonstrations are appropriate and when they are not. We find that a moderately high-valued outside option can help the seller gain from a demonstration even when the buyer is not underestimating the value of the data. Demonstrations can also be useful when the buyer is biased and underestimates data set value. When both an outside option and underestimation exist, the provision of a demo that corrects for bias can make otherwise unsuccessful negotiations succeed; it also has the potential to trigger the provision of uncertainty-reducing information in the demo. In the presence of a demo cost, the seller can provide a partially informative demo; demos can also mitigate the effects of cannibalization up to a point.

Keywords: Nash bargaining; data monetization; demonstrations; outside option (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0872 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15