Electronic Health Records and the Logics of Care: Complementarity and Conflict in the U.S. Healthcare System

Sean Hansen () and A. James Baroody ()
Additional contact information
Sean Hansen: Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623
A. James Baroody: Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623

Information Systems Research, 2020, vol. 31, issue 1, 57-75

Abstract: The U.S. healthcare system has experienced rapid growth in the adoption and use of clinical health information technology, such as electronic health record (EHR) systems. In a field as complex and pluralistic as healthcare, the introduction of these sweeping information technology platforms is transforming the practices, roles, interdependencies, and communication mechanisms that connect a heterogeneous mix of stakeholders. In this study, we assess the impact of EHR adoption and use on the practices of U.S. healthcare stakeholders and the institutional logics that they instantiate. We identify four prominent logics around the adoption and use of EHR systems—medical professionalism, private sector managerialism, technical design, and regulatory oversight. Our analysis reveals the ways in which practices enacted through EHR systems interact to engender a confluence of the institutional logics that mark the field. Specifically, we theorize a mechanism by which the reticulation, or intertwining, of practices mediated by an EHR system variously fosters complementarity and conflict between institutional logics based on the commensurability of the organizing principles invoked. This proposed framework offers a novel approach to the role of information system use in the institutional dynamics of the healthcare system. In addition, this research offers a range of practical insights regarding the ways in which the diverse institutional logics of the U.S. healthcare system may be impacted by the growth of EHR system use.

Keywords: electronic health records; clinical health IT; institutional logics; grounded theory methodology; reticulation of practices (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0875 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:57-75

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().