The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use

Zhewei Zhang (), Youngjin Yoo (), Kalle Lyytinen () and Aron Lindberg ()
Additional contact information
Zhewei Zhang: Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
Youngjin Yoo: Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Kalle Lyytinen: Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Aron Lindberg: School of Business, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030

Information Systems Research, 2021, vol. 32, issue 4, 1192-1213

Abstract: In the extant theoretical discourse on sociotechnical systems, the relationships between inputs and outputs of technologies are assumed to be knowable to human agents, occasionally ex ante and always ex post. Recently, a new breed of autonomous tools has emerged, which can independently learn and execute novel actions. The input–output relationships of these tools, however, are unknowable to human agents both ex ante and ex post. This calls for analysis of how humans experience the enactment of socio-material agency while interacting with autonomous tools. To this end, we conduct an exploratory, theory-building, comparative case study at one of the world’s largest semiconductor manufacturers. We investigate how chip designers interact with two families of design technologies: one following a traditional designer-centric approach in which the designer knows what outputs particular inputs to the tools will generate and another relying on autonomous tools that continually surprise the user. Our inquiry reveals significant differences in designers’ experiences of using different tools. When using autonomous tools, designers’ experience of enacting socio-material agency becomes liminal , a state of continuous emergence, in which interactions with the tools are marked by ambiguity, and the design is moved forward along multiple design trajectories in accordance with a multifarious temporality. These insights require us to expand upon several dominant views on the enactment of socio-material agency and necessitate novel thinking on the role and impact of autonomous tools in future work systems as well as on how design and innovation proceeds under such conditions.

Keywords: autonomous tools; socio-material agency; liminality; design; digital innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1022 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:1192-1213

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().