Alternative Securities Trading Systems: Tests and Regulatory Implications of the Adoption of Technology
Eric K. Clemons and
Bruce W. Weber
Additional contact information
Eric K. Clemons: Department of Operations and Information Management, Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall 1300, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6366
Bruce W. Weber: Department of Information Systems, Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 West 4th Street, New York, New York 10012-1126
Information Systems Research, 1996, vol. 7, issue 2, 163-188
Abstract:
Reasons for the mixed reactions to today's electronic off-exchange trading systems are examined, and regulatory implications are explored. Information technology (IT) could provide more automated markets, which have lower costs. Yet for an electronic trading system to form a liquid and widely used market, a sufficient number of traders would need to make a transition away from established trading venues and to this alternative way of trading. This transition may not actually occur for a variety of reasons. Two tests are performed of the feasibility and the desirability of transitions to new markets. In the first test, traders in a series of economic experiments demonstrate an ability to make a transition and develop a critical mass of trading activity in a newly opened market. In the second test, simulation is used to compare the floor-based specialist auction in place in most U.S. stock exchanges today to a disintermediated alternative employing screen-based order matching. The results indicate that reducing the role of dealer-intermediaries can actually diminish important measures of market quality. Our findings suggest that the low trading volumes on many off-exchange systems do not result from traders' inability to break away from established trading floors. Rather, today's off-exchange trading systems are not uniformly superior to the trading mechanisms of traditional exchanges. Thus, regulatory actions favoring off-exchange trading systems are not warranted; but, improved designs for IT-based trading mechanisms are needed, and when these are available, they are likely to win significant trading volume from established exchanges.
Keywords: electronic markets; trading systems; experimental economics; technology adoption; financial market simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.2.163 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:163-188
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().