EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing Predicted Choices Against Observations in Probabilistic Discrete-Choice Models

Joel L. Horowitz and Jordan J. Louviere
Additional contact information
Joel L. Horowitz: University of Iowa
Jordan J. Louviere: University of Utah

Marketing Science, 1993, vol. 12, issue 3, 270-279

Abstract: Probabilistic discrete-choice models, such as multinomial logit models, are widely used to predict changes in market shares or total demand resulting from changes in policy variables under management control. These models often are evaluated in terms of their ability to predict choices in a holdout sample. This paper presents a new test for comparing predicted and observed choices. The results of a Monte Carlo experiment indicate that the new test has good finite-sample properties and high power in several circumstances likely to arise frequently in applications.

Keywords: regression and other statistical techniques; brand choice; econometric models; choice models; estimation and other statistical techniques (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.3.270 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:12:y:1993:i:3:p:270-279

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:12:y:1993:i:3:p:270-279