Editorial: Who Is Afraid to Give Freedom of Speech to Marketing Folks?

Steven M. Shugan ()
Additional contact information
Steven M. Shugan: University of Florida, Warrington College of Business, 201B Bryan Hall, P.O. Box 117155, Gainesville, Florida 32611

Marketing Science, 2006, vol. 25, issue 5, 403-410

Abstract: Despite the invaluable contribution of marketing folks (e.g., making markets work), they fail to enjoy the same freedom of speech as others. This fact is particularly egregious because unlike other groups that can use threats, force, or coercion, marketing folks rely only on speech. Although the U.S. Constitution never mentions commercial speech, the courts invented the concept to censor marketing folks. The cloudy rational was that consumers need special protection from marketing folks (e.g., advertising). Naturally, censorship leads to abuse. Powerful incumbents use censorship covertly against new entrants. Politicians use censorship surreptitiously to promote their own political goals. If consumers need protection, it is certainly from the misleading statements of those with freedom of speech—politicians, attorneys, the news media, and the censors.

Keywords: freedom of speech; commercial speech; censorship; advertising; marketing; regulation; branding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0236 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:25:y:2006:i:5:p:403-410

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().