Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models

Timothy J. Gilbride () and Greg M. Allenby ()
Additional contact information
Timothy J. Gilbride: Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556
Greg M. Allenby: Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Marketing Science, 2006, vol. 25, issue 5, 494-509

Abstract: Consumer choice in surveys and in the marketplace reflects a complex process of screening and evaluating choice alternatives. Behavioral and economic models of choice processes are difficult to estimate when using stated and revealed preferences because the underlying process is latent. This paper introduces Bayesian methods for estimating two behavioral models that eliminate alternatives using specific attribute levels. The elimination by aspects theory postulates a sequential elimination of alternatives by attribute levels until a single one, the chosen alternative, remains. In the economic screening rule model, respondents screen out alternatives with certain attribute levels and then choose from the remaining alternatives, using a compensatory function of all the attributes. The economic screening rule model gives an economic justification as to why certain attributes are used to screen alternatives. A commercial conjoint study is used to illustrate the methods and assess their performance. In this data set, the economic screening rule model outperforms the EBA and other standard choice models and provides comparable results to an equivalent conjunctive screening rule model.

Keywords: elimination by aspects; consideration sets; attribute screening; noncompensatory decision processes; conjoint analysis; hierarchical Bayes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0211 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:25:y:2006:i:5:p:494-509

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().