Practice Prize Report—Quantifying and Improving Promotion Effectiveness at CVS

Kusum L. Ailawadi (), Bari A. Harlam (), Jacques César () and David Trounce ()
Additional contact information
Kusum L. Ailawadi: Tuck School at Dartmouth College, 100 Tuck Hall, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Bari A. Harlam: CVS Corporation, One CVS Drive, Woonsocket, Rhode Island 02895
Jacques César: Mercer Management Consulting, 1 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7HJ, UK
David Trounce: Mercer Management Consulting, 1 California Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-5421

Marketing Science, 2007, vol. 26, issue 4, 566-575

Abstract: We quantified the net unit and profit impact of each promotion offered in 2003 by CVS, a leading U.S. drug retail chain, and analyzed the key drivers of variation in this net impact. We used this analysis to identify the least effective promotions and conducted a controlled field test to demonstrate the impact of eliminating them before chainwide implementation. Our key findings are as follows. First, approximately 45% of the gross lift from promotions is incremental for CVS. Further, for every unit of gross lift, 0.16 unit of some other product is purchased elsewhere in the store. Still, more than 50% of promotions are not profitable because the lower promotional margin is not sufficiently offset by incremental units. Second, there is substantial variation in net profit impact across categories. Our field test shows that eliminating promotions chainwide in 15 of the worst performing categories will decrease sales by about $7.8 million but will improve profit by approximately $52.6 million. This is very impressive given that CVS front store sales in 2003 were approximately $9 billion while the net profit impact of promotions was -$25.3 million.

Keywords: promotion profitability; retail promotions; retail promotion impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0245 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:26:y:2007:i:4:p:566-575

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().