—Marketing-Mix Recommendations to Manage Value Growth at P&G Asia-Pacific
V. Kumar (),
Jia Fan (),
Rohit Gulati () and
P. Venkat ()
Additional contact information
V. Kumar: J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Altanta, Georgia 30303
Jia Fan: J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Altanta, Georgia 30303
Rohit Gulati: Proctor & Gamble Asia-Pacific, Pte Ltd., Singapore 307684
P. Venkat: Proctor & Gamble Asia-Pacific, Pte Ltd., Singapore 307684
Marketing Science, 2009, vol. 28, issue 4, 645-655
Abstract:
Procter & Gamble (P&G) Asia-Pacific is interested in managing value growth. Only after fully understanding the true effects of the marketing-mix variables can P&G managers make strategic decisions answering questions such as the following: (1) Are the P&G brands in the detergent market inelastic or elastic with respect to price? How has the price elasticity changed over time? Can P&G increase the price of its brands to gain value growth? (2) What are the price, distribution, and sizing combinations needed to achieve the desirable value growth? (3) How can P&G gain market share from its competitors without cannibalizing its own brands? P&G Asia-Pacific approached us to develop a value growth framework to answer these questions. To generate the answers for the above questions, we develop a three-step weighted random coefficient estimator that captures the heterogeneity across cross sections (different stock-keeping units and states) and the endogeneity of distribution. Based on the parameter estimates, we provide strategic recommendations to P&G for a field test to validate our suggestions. We developed a simulator for P&G managers so that they can generate appropriate marketing-mix strategies for achieving the desired value growth. As a result, P&G gained over $39 million in value growth over a one-year period by implementing the recommendations from our modeling approach.
Keywords: marketing mix; price elasticity; distribution; random coefficient model; system of equations; sales value; revenue; sales volume (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0477 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:28:y:2009:i:4:p:645-655
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().