Can Marketing Campaigns Induce Multichannel Buying and More Profitable Customers? A Field Experiment
Elisa Montaguti (),
Scott A. Neslin () and
Sara Valentini ()
Additional contact information
Elisa Montaguti: Management Department, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Scott A. Neslin: Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Sara Valentini: Management Department, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Marketing Science, 2016, vol. 35, issue 2, 201-217
Abstract:
One of the most intriguing findings in the multichannel customer management literature is the positive association between multichannel purchasing and customer profitability. The question is whether this finding can be put into action. That is, can a firm develop a marketing campaign to increase multichannel purchasing and hence average customer profitability, and if so what are the key factors that enable success. We design and implement a randomized field experiment to investigate this question. The field experiment tests four marketing campaigns that vary in the communications message and the provision of financial incentives. We find that the multichannel/profitability relationship is actionable. A properly designed marketing campaign increases the number of multichannel customers and increases average customer profitability. That campaign’s message emphasizes the benefits of multichannel shopping but does not rely on financial incentives. Moreover, we use propensity score matching to show that, after accounting for self-selection, multichannel customers are more profitable than they would be if they were not multichannel. A post-test analysis suggests that the multichannel/nonfinancial incentive campaign succeeded in inducing customers to become multichannel because it decreased customer reactance and increased perceived behavioral control.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0923 .
Keywords: multichannel shopping; customer profitability; field experiment; treatment effect on the treated (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0923 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:35:y:2016:i:2:p:201-217
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().