Advertising to Early Trend Propagators: Evidence from Twitter

Anja Lambrecht (), Catherine Tucker () and Caroline Wiertz ()
Additional contact information
Anja Lambrecht: London Business School, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom
Catherine Tucker: MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Caroline Wiertz: Cass Business School, City, University of London, London EC1Y 8TZ, United Kingdom

Marketing Science, 2018, vol. 37, issue 2, 177-199

Abstract: In the digital economy, influencing and controlling the spread of information is a key concern for firms. One way firms try to achieve this is to target firm communications to consumers who embrace and propagate the spread of new information on emerging and “trending” topics on social media. However, little is known about whether early trend propagators are indeed responsive to firm-sponsored messages. To explore whether early propagators of trending topics respond to advertising messages, we use data from two field tests conducted by a charity and an emerging fashion firm on the microblogging service Twitter. On Twitter, “promoted tweets” allow advertisers to target individuals based on the content of their recent postings. Twitter continuously identifies in real time which topics are newly popular among Twitter users. In the field tests, we collaborated with a charity and a fashion firm to target ads at consumers who embraced a Twitter trend early in its life cycle by posting about it, and compared their behavior to that of consumers who posted about the same topic later on. Throughout both field tests, we consistently find that early propagators of trends are less responsive to advertising than consumers who embrace trends later.

Keywords: online advertising; targeting; Twitter; user-generated content; Internet (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1062 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:37:y:2018:i:2:p:177-199

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().