EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Pricing Under Dynamic Competition When Loyal Consumers Stockpile

Manish Gangwar (), Nanda Kumar () and Ram C. Rao ()
Additional contact information
Manish Gangwar: Indian School of Business, Hyderabad, India 500111
Nanda Kumar: Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080
Ram C. Rao: Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080

Marketing Science, 2021, vol. 40, issue 3, 569-588

Abstract: One goal of promotions for frequently purchased products is increasing short-term sales. Increases could be at competitors’ expense, coming from consumers with relatively weak brand preferences. However, increased sales from brand-loyal consumers could well cannibalize future sales of the promoted brand. An unintended consequence of promotions is that loyal consumers otherwise willing to pay high prices may strategically stockpile at low prices. What is its impact on firms’ profits? Who benefits from stockpiling? How should firms adapt their pricing to accommodate consumer stockpiling? For answers, we analyze an infinite horizon dynamic model of competition and derive the Markov perfect equilibrium pricing strategies that yield several managerial insights. We find strategic stockpiling does not reduce firms’ long-run profits when managers adopt pricing strategies we identify. Turning to strategies, stockpiling causes firms to move away from frequently promoting below the stockpiling threshold, but it leads to mass points at reservation price and stockpiling threshold. Stockpiling is beneficial to consumers who stockpile but hurts those that do not stockpile, whereas switchers remain largely unaffected. State-dependent pricing as a result of stockpiling leads to positive intertemporal price correlation, implying, counterintuitively, that in equilibrium, deep promotions should be followed by deep promotions.

Keywords: consumer stockpiling; loyal consumers; dynamic competition; pricing; game theory; Markov perfect equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1262 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:40:y:2021:i:3:p:569-588

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:40:y:2021:i:3:p:569-588