Cross-Sectional Estimation in Marketing: Direct Versus Reverse Regression
Wilfried R. Vanhonacker and
Diana Day
Additional contact information
Wilfried R. Vanhonacker: Columbia University
Diana Day: University of Pennsylvania
Marketing Science, 1987, vol. 6, issue 3, 254-267
Abstract:
Empirical results in marketing research are often derived from linear additive models estimated on cross-sectional data. An underlying assumption of these model specifications is that each exogenous variable contributes an additive effect to the endogenous variable. Measuring these additive effects is problematic if some components of the endogenous variable are not observable to the researcher. Reliance on observable correlates to capture those aspects of the endogenous variable might require reverse regression to ensure unbiasedness of the estimated effects. In contrast to direct regression used exclusively in marketing research, reverse regression first estimates the effect of the endogenous variable on those correlates and then derives unbiased estimates of the additive effect of other exogenous variables specified in the basic model. This paper discusses the reverse regression approach relying on recently published analytic results. A statistically powerful and analytically simple test is developed which allows the marketing researcher to assess a priori whether direct or reverse regression will provide unbiased parameter estimates. An empirical illustration focuses on the measurement of potential market share rewards for pioneering businesses contained in the PIMS data base. Other areas in marketing where the issue of direct versus reverse regression is pertinent are mentioned.
Keywords: cross-sectional estimation; reverse regression; direct regression; unobservable variables (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.6.3.254 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:6:y:1987:i:3:p:254-267
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Marketing Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().