EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Reflections on the ORSA Guidelines: A Story, a Poem and a Commentary

Paul Peters, John Nelson, Chai Kim and Eugene Rathswohl
Additional contact information
Paul Peters: University of Pittsburgh
John Nelson: University of Pittsburgh
Chai Kim: University of Pittsburgh
Eugene Rathswohl: University of Pittsburgh

Management Science, 1972, vol. 18, issue 10, B626-B629

Abstract: A story and a poem are presented as vehicles through which to express the authors' impressions of the Guidelines for the practice of operations research issued by the Operations Research Society of America. A commentary on the story and poem is included. This commentary makes the points that the language of the Guidelines is inappropriate to both the practitioner of operations research and his or her client, and that the Guidelines allow and approve of inhumane behavior on the part of a practitioner of operations research. The argument is made that the linguistic problem, if appreciated, can probably be easily rectified. An acceptance of the legitimacy of the second problem, however, is argued to imply a change of attitude.

Date: 1972
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.10.B626 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:18:y:1972:i:10:p:b626-b629

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:18:y:1972:i:10:p:b626-b629