EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Constraint Qualifications Revisited

M. S. Bazaraa, J. J. Goode and C. M. Shetty
Additional contact information
M. S. Bazaraa: Georgia Institute of Technology
J. J. Goode: Georgia Institute of Technology
C. M. Shetty: Georgia Institute of Technology

Management Science, 1972, vol. 18, issue 9, 567-573

Abstract: In this study we investigate the constraint qualifications for the Kuhn-Tucker conditions to hold for an inequality-constrained nonlinear programming problem. We present the qualifications in a consistent manner so that the interrelationships between them are highlighted. This gives rise naturally to two types of constraint qualifications, and it will be seen that air the qualifications of one type are almost equally weak whereas the other type of qualifications makes relatively strong assumptions. In the study we also slightly relax the Kuhn-Tucker and some other constraint qualifications, and also show the interrelationship between some of the qualifications which have not been established thus far.

Date: 1972
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.18.9.567 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:18:y:1972:i:9:p:567-573

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:18:y:1972:i:9:p:567-573