Comparison of Computer Algorithms and Visual Based Methods for Plant Layout
Michael Scriabin and
Roger C. Vergin
Additional contact information
Michael Scriabin: Simon Fraser University
Roger C. Vergin: Simon Fraser University
Management Science, 1975, vol. 22, issue 2, 172-181
Abstract:
Increasing emphasis on the reduction of materials handling costs in the modern plant has led to research into new methods of planning the process type layout in such a way as to minimize these costs. This project compares the performances of three highly rated computer algorithms prescribed for the solution of the plant layout problem with the performances of selected human subjects using the manual and visual methods still used and recommended by industrial engineers for plant layout design. The objective of this comparison is to determine whether there is in fact an advantage to using one of the available computer programs to solve the problem, instead of designing the layout by traditional visual-based methods. These tests, performed under the control of a computer system which accurately recorded the solutions achieved by each subject, show not only that the computer algorithms do not perform better than selected human subjects in the design of plant layouts, but that the human subjects, without the benefit of any prescriptive help from a computer, actually achieve layouts which are stochastically better than those produced by the computer programs.
Date: 1975
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.2.172 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:22:y:1975:i:2:p:172-181
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().