Organizational Systematics: Taxonomic Lessons from Biology

Bill McKelvey
Additional contact information
Bill McKelvey: University of California, Los Angelos

Management Science, 1978, vol. 24, issue 13, 1428-1440

Abstract: This paper argues that important lessons about the theory and method of organizational classification may be learned from biological systematics, defined as the "science of differences." Three main components of systematics studies are discussed: (1) taxonomy, the development of a concept of organizational differences; (2) evolution, the tracing of the lineages of organizational form; and (3) classification, the development of procedures for identifying and placing organizational forms into classes. Furthermore, two kinds of classification are identified and several theories of classification are discussed. Systematics is seen as a necessary prerequisite to studies aiming to identify generalizable principles of organizational function and process. Finally, some implications for defining populations and drawing samples of organizations are noted, along with other implications for organization design and development and managerial practice.

Keywords: organizational systematics; taxonomy; classification; evolution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1978
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.13.1428 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:24:y:1978:i:13:p:1428-1440

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().