EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation

John E. Ettlie, William P. Bridges and Robert D. O'Keefe
Additional contact information
John E. Ettlie: Department of Management, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 60604
William P. Bridges: Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60680
Robert D. O'Keefe: Department of Management, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 60604

Management Science, 1984, vol. 30, issue 6, 682-695

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to test a model of the organizational innovation process that suggests that the strategy-structure causal sequence is differentiated by radical versus incremental innovation. That is, unique strategy and structure will be required for radical innovation, especially process adoption, while more traditional strategy and structure arrangements tend to support new product introduction and incremental process adoption. This differentiated theory is strongly supported by data from the food processing industry. Specifically, radical process and packaging adoption are significantly promoted by an aggressive technology policy and the concentration of technical specialists. Incremental process adoption and new product introduction tends to be promoted in large, complex, decentralized organizations that have market dominated growth strategies. Findings also suggest that more traditional structural arrangements might be used for radical change initiation if the general tendencies that occur in these dimensions as a result of increasing size can be delayed, briefly modified, or if the organization can be partitioned structurally for radical vs. incremental innovation. In particular, centralization of decision making appears to be necessary for radical process adoption along with the movement away from complexity toward more organizational generalists. This suggests that a greater support of top managers in the innovation process is necessary to initiate and sustain radical departures from the past for that organization.

Keywords: research and development: innovation; organizational studies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (191)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:6:p:682-695

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-24
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:6:p:682-695