EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Rationality in the Analysis of Behavioral Simulation Models

John D. W. Morecroft
Additional contact information
John D. W. Morecroft: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Management Science, 1985, vol. 31, issue 7, 900-916

Abstract: An important task in the analysis of a behavioral simulation model is to explain clearly how the model's organizational assumptions lead to its simulated behavior. All too often, model-based arguments involve an uncomfortable "leap of logic" between equations and consequences. This paper proposes two methods of analysis, premise description and partial model testing, which provide stepping stones between model equations and their simulated consequences. Premise description examines the bounded rationality of policies or decision functions in the model, pointing out the process and cognitive limitations assumed in decisionmaking. Partial model tests expose the intended rationality of smalt combinations of policies, showing that policies produce "sensible" actions with respect to their premises. The application of those methods is illustrated with a simulation model of a sales organization in which sales-force productivity is prone to decline. The behavior of productivity is traced to dysfunctional interactions between objectives, overtime, and salesforce motivation.

Keywords: behavioral simulation models; system dynamics; bounded rationality; simulation analysis; salesforce and productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.7.900 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:31:y:1985:i:7:p:900-916

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:31:y:1985:i:7:p:900-916