Financial Futures Hedging Via Goal Programming

Ramesh Sharda and Kathryn D. Musser
Additional contact information
Kathryn D. Musser: Execucom Systems Corporation, P.O. Box 9758, Austin, Texas 78766

Management Science, 1986, vol. 32, issue 8, 933-947

Abstract: This paper presents multiperiod, multiple objective goal programming as an alternative to the more conventional hedge ratio approaches to financial futures hedging. The described model offers the potential benefits of: (i) simultaneous achievement of multiple hedge-related objectives (i.e., minimization of transactions and margin opportunity costs; regulation of cash flow, and maximization of profits accruing from both the cash and futures positions); and (ii) periodic modification and updating of the futures position, as suggested by actual, observed prices and interest rates, throughout the hedging period. To assess its overall effectiveness, the model was applied to develop appropriate hedging strategies for three separate time periods, each representing a unique interest rate trend (i.e., upward movement, downward movement, and no change). Since real-world implementation of the model requires the use of forecast data, independent forecasts of both cash and futures prices were generated via (1) moving average, (2) exponential smoothing, and (3) random walk techniques. In progressing through each of the 13-week time periods, all forecasts were updated with the previous weeks' actual price data. Revised forecasts and actual price data were then incorporated into the model constraints on a weekly schedule. This approach, in essence, provided weekly futures activity recommendations based on the most recent price and interest rate developments observed at any point during the hedging period. The realized gains or losses were then compared to the previously-derived "perfect foresight" model results and to the traditional hedge ratio results. This allowed for evaluation of the model's effectiveness under varying forecast methods and varying interest rate trends. The results show that the goal programming model outperformed other strategies in most cases.

Keywords: programming: multiple criteria; goal programming; financial futures; hedging; finance: brokerage; trading; banks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1986
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.8.933 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:8:p:933-947

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().